Shadow Banking System: A Dreadful Challenge!
The
world has hardly coped with its latest economic nightmare - financial crisis
that started during 2007/08. The conditions now show impressive signs to
portray the revival from the crisis but one might not be sure enough as the
economic activities follow a cycle. Ben Bernanke in April, 2012 defined Shadow
Banking System – “Shadow banking, as
usually defined, comprises a diverse set of institutions and markets that,
collectively, carry out traditional banking functions--but do so outside, or in
ways only loosely linked to, the traditional system of regulated depository
institutions. Examples of important components of the shadow banking system
include securitization
vehicles, asset-backed commercial
paper (ABCP) conduits, money market mutual funds, markets for repurchase agreements (repos), investment
banks, and mortgage companies.”
Investment
banks used the Off-Balance Sheet, Securitization to finance mortgages and their
risk was hedged through Off-Balance Sheet Credit Default Swaps before the
crisis. But things changed in 2008, when investment banks like Morgan Stanley
and Goldman Sachs became the bank holding companies; famous companies like
Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearnswere took on by bank holding companies and the
most of all, Lehman Brothers declared its bankruptcy. Statistics show that the
volume of the Shadow Banking System (SBS) transactions sky-rocketed after 2000
basically, the only reason for it can be the easy access to financial services
through the non-official banks, but as long as the intentions were fulfilled,
ethics was ignored. According to the Financial Stability Board Report, the
volume of SBS transactions has increased to $67 trillion in November 2012 which
was about $50 trillion in 2007, so the condition looks very vibrant.
Our
region feels no less proud to mention again that we did not get affected much
during that crisis. But a thought struck when I read that a company in India
took small deposits and promised the payments on land, apartments or the loan
interests but finally, neither the staffs of the company got paid nor the 1.74
million people got any promised service. Similarly, China is also coming up
with a law to repel the SBS transactions like Off-Balance Sheet loans which
will ultimately reduce the reported level of lending. Nepali market recently
did go through a news headlines which suggested that the money worth more than
NRs. 8 arabs went in vain through the cooperatives and that the regulated
banking channel is yet to discover and recover the loan worth NRs. 25 arabs.
The first one is a sheer example of SBS transaction and the latter one
portraying the inefficient banking regulation.
Few major reasons why
SBS transactions have been ignored globally and now nationally are that they
have cultural explanations, they are happy enough maintaining low profile and
our regulators/government keep high focus on banks and insurance companies. If
the negligence continues, poor will become poorer; local and regional economic
challenge is inescapable!
Note: This article was published in the Perspectives of The Himalayan Times.
Comments
Post a Comment